nation in distress

The World Anthem




by emile eduoard charles antoine zola , Donplaypuks® intrepid correspondent for government conspiracy affairs


(Click on pics for enlarged view).

On the anniversary of Anwar Ibrahim's term in prison for that scandalous decision by the Courts of Appeal and the Federal Court in confirming the reversal of his acquittal at the High Court for allegedly engaging in consensual acts against the order of nature with Saiful, Mahathir and Najib look guiltier than ever!

Little wonder Mahathir is parodied as 'Maha Thiruden' (Tamil for 'Great Robber') and Najib as 'Serially Lying and Defrauding Prime Minister'.


1. When charged, Anwar gave the High Court the perfect alibi. The Bangsar condo in which the accuser Azizan Abu Bakar had alleged the sexual trysts took place, had not finished being built until two years later!! Crooked AG Mohtar then confiscated all of Anwar's diaries, and when he found a gap there, persuaded Azizan to "remember" a new date for the charge. Instead of throwing the case out, Judge Augustine Paul incredibly allowed partner-in-crime Mohtar to amend the charges to 'some day 1993'. What a Mahathir conspiratorial ally Paul turned out to be! 

This case should not have proceeded beyond this stage as it was clear Azizan was lying through his eyeteeth, and was being manipulated by conspirators, no doubt for huge monetary compensation.

2. Then Attorney-General Mohtar Abdullah "advised" Anwar to make a police report over the publication of '50 Reasons Why Anwar Cannot Become the Prime Minister". Instead of investigating the scurrilous book and its author, Mohtar charged Anwar with Sodomy! With a friend like that, who needed an enemy? Mohtar never woke up from a coma after a stroke in 2003.

3. Mahathir gave press conferences alleging all kinds of sexual trysts and depraved acts. There were rumors of "secret tape recordings by the Special Branch in London hotels". To-date, after 17 years, not a single peep, video or photo has emerged.

4. Mahathir personally met several persons who alleged sodomy, secretly. This included the accuser Azizan Abu Bakar (Anwar's wife's chauffeur) and his backers like Ummi Hafilda, before Anwar was arrested and charged. Why did these people go to Mahathir and not the IGP? Why this Arabian Nights type of charades if it was all kosher?

5. At first, Azizan Abu Bakar could not even recall when the alleged incidents took place. He had told no one about it or made a police report until 1998, when Mahathir stepped in.

6. Following Azizan's accusation, Anwar's adopted brother Sukma, and his ex-speech writer Munawar, a US citizen, were both convicted of engaging in homosexual acts with Anwar, after they had "confessed voluntarily" to the gentle probings of our totally neutral police. At his trial, Munawar appeared so spaced out, disoriented and sick that the judge had to ask him if he needed medical assistance. He was represented in court by ex-policemen who had been called to the Bar.

7. Even before Anwar was asked to answer the charges against him, Paul ruled that Anwar could not pursue the defence of conspiracy. This was the first of his many "irrelevant" rulings!

8. DPP Gani Patail then produced that infamous 'Anwar's semen stained mattress' that had been stored in the open at a police station, as evidence. Firstly, it appeared from a map of the alleged semen stains, that sexual acts had taken place in cockscrew fashion all over the mattress! Secondly, even after some 5-7 years, the Chemistry Department claimed the semen stains were fresh and matched Anwar's DNA??!! Someone had manufactured evidence out of thin air!

9. Azizan was charged and convicted of sodomy earlier, but received no prison sentence or caning!

10. Azizan Abu Bakar did not produce a single witness to corroborate his accusation.

11. Azizan Abu Bakar could not name a single hotel at which the alleged crime had taken place, although he claimed it had happened several times in several hotels!

12. Judge Augustine Paul refused to allow the defence to call Mahathir as a witness. If all the allegations were true, and after all it was Mahathir who engineered the entire prosecution, why was Mahathir afraid to come to court, if he was championing the truth? Why did he slink away in gutless fashion like a true coward?

13. Half-way through the trial, when AG Mohtar and DPP Gani Patail realized their DNA evidence and case were in tatters. they filed a motion to amend the sodomy charges to abuse of power and corruption. It had only then dawned on these two geniuses that with only the testimony of one man's words against another, and the passage of time, it was impossible to prove a charge of consensual or non-consensual sex (rape) between accuser Azizan and Anwar!

14. Incredibly again, Judge Augustine Paul allowed the amendment, instead of throwing the case out the nearest window. More than that, Paul, after allowing Anwar's good name to be smeared all over the world, ordered all testimony of sodomy and evidence to be "expunged" from the court records!

15. Anwar was eventually convicted of corruption and abuse of power on the uncorroborated evidence of a single Special Branch officer who testified that Anwar had ordered to him to force witnesses to retract their statements to the police. Some years later, that same officer alleged Mahathir had ordered him to stop investigating a Bank Negara Malaysia Governor in whose desk was found $1 million unaccounted for cash!

16. When the Federal Court over-turned Anwar's conviction in 2004, one of the judges scurrilously wrote that he was convinced homosexual had taken place even though he conceded that Azizan Abu Bakar was an inveterate liar! This was done to protect Mahathir who could still continue to claim that he was justified in his conspiratorial conduct. But really, what place has a judge's personal opinion in a Federal Court judgement, other than spite, intention to smear and covering-up for Mahathir's despicable and vindictive conspiracy.

17. After the trial, Azizan Abu Bakar had started a fashion boutique business. Where Azizan would have had the wealth to go into business on his savings as a driver, is anybody's guess. Half-way through the trial, Azizan was arrested for committing khalwat in September 1999. So much for Azizan's solid credentials and 'higher moral ground' that Augustine Paul, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court had relied upon and championed.

18. What would have been Azizan's motive for lying? Well, he was sacked from his driver's job, and despite his pleadings, not reinstated. Throughout history, revenge and money have always been powerful reasons for one man to bring down another!

19. What happened to the charges by former by ex-KL CID Chief Mat Zain that DPP Gani Patail and doctors had falsified medical reports? CLICK HERE.

This entire saga was Mahathir's attempt to distract Malaysians from asking for his head for being the primary cause of the 1997 Asian Currency Crisis which wiped out many Malay and Bumiputra businesses and companies to the tune of tens of billions of ringgit. This included Mahathir's son's public listed company, Perkapalan, which was bailed out by Petronas for $1.7 billion on Mahathir's orders. When Anwar, then Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, objected to government bail out of Mahathir's nepotistic and cronies' businesses, Mahathir struck back with poison and vengeance.

Mahathir also blamed George Soros for short selling the Malaysian Ringgit, causing it to plunge to more than RM4 against the US dollar. He had lashed out at international currency traders as "rogues". However, in the 80's Mahathir himself had secretly directed Malaysia's federal reserve bank, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), to gamble against the US dollar, resulting in trading losses of more than RM30 billion. Mahathir was found out when the Opposition queried a huge hole in BNM's balance sheet. Mahathir lied in Parliament that the losses amounted to only RM6 billion, and sacked BNM Governor Jaafar Awang. In fact, he had approved BNM cooking the books to hide losses of more than RM30 billion, by re-valuing gold and other reserves upwards, and masking the real size of the massive losses. So, Mahathir demonising Soros and "rogue" currency traders was aimed at deflecting blame on his own economic planning failures. Do nt forget that Mahathir also lost the nation some $2 billion when trying to corner the tin market in the 'Maminco' fiasco. When it suited him, the international currency and futures markets were fair game for anyone with capital, but when he lost gambling big with Taxpayers' hard earned money, it was all an IMF/Zionist/Jewish/Soros plot to topple obscure Malaysia!

The BNM trader mainly responsible for those losses and who was asked to leave BNM, Nor Mohamad Yakcop, has miraculously found his way back in government. Appointed Finance Minister II from 2004-2009, he is now Head of the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) with the rank of Minister in the Prime Minister's Office. Only in Malaysia! The EPU is often referred to as the Economic Plundering Unit!!


1. The appeal against Anwar's acquittal at the High Court was filed almost on the last day before the deadline expired. AG Gani Patail was reluctant to appeal. However, Najib and BUMNO hardliners pressured him to file the appeal to the Court of Appeal which promptly reversed the High Court decision!

2. As with Sodomy1 and Azizan Abu Bakar, Saiful's accusation of sodomy on 28 June 2008, was uncorroborated. He did not produce a single witness to support his allegations. Once again, it was a case of one man's words against another, backed by iffy DNA evidence and a posse of government doctors prepared to slant their testimony to save their jobs, despite the lack of evidence of penetrative sex. 

3. Najib first lied that he knew of no one named Saiful. When a photo was published of Saiful posing outside Najib's office with his aide Khairil Anas Yusof, Najib did a u-turn and said Saiful had asked for help with a scholarship and had met his aide.

4. Later, more exposes emerged of a meeting between Saiful and Najib, at Najib's home, two days before the alleged sexual act took place. Present at that meeting were also Khairil and lawyer Shafee (whom AG Gani Patail later appointed as outside counsel to handle the government's case at the Court of Appeal, and now rumored to be in line to be appointed the next AG). Then, Najib had telephone IGP Musa and later Saiful had telephoned IGP Musa who set up a meeting between Saiful and SRC Rodwan at the Melia Hotel. This was all confirmed by Saiful under oath in court! 

Apparently, Najib only advised Saiful to make a police report.


5. Prior to that meeting, Saiful had secretly met up with Khairil, his uncle 'Pet', Mumtaz Jaafar (who was a Director of the National Athletes' Foundation where Najib's wife Rosmah was the Chairman) AND Anwar's ex-right hand man who had defected to UMNO, Senator Mohamed Ezam Nor!!

6. On the day of the alleged incident having taken place at a condo owned by Anwar's friend, Saiful made every effort to make sure his image would be captured on CCTV cameras there. However, they were no recordings whatsoever of Saiful entering that particular condo.

7. Although AG Gani Patail had filed charges of consensual sex against the order of nature, Saiful had claimed under oath that it was non-consensual and that it had happened 7 or 8 times. Raped 7 or 8 seven times in various locations including in overseas hotel rooms??!! He kept going back for more punishment when he could have resigned his job with Anwar and disappeared? He never put up a fight against someone about 40-years older than him and who was known internationally to be a chronic back-ache sufferer? No witnesses, no one heard screams or protests? Why did he not file a police report earlier!

8. When there was a blatant contradiction between the 'consensual' charge and Saiful's claim under oath of of rape, Judge Yusof Zainal Abden still refused to throw out the case. 

9. If it was non-consensual, why did Saiful go to the condo with a tube of KY jelly in his pocket? Saiful only brought up the issue of KY jelly when testifying on the stand, but had made no mention of it to doctors or in his police report. This was another obvious lie by Saiful, as government chemists found no evidence of KY jelly on the bed or carpets in the condo, on his underwear or in his body!

10. A Burmese doctor at the Pusrawi Hospital, where Saiful had gone to complain of a stomach pain, had written a report that Saiful had told him that a VIP had inserted a plastic object into his anus. Saiful denied this on the stand, but that report has been published. There was no reason for an experienced and totally unconnected GP to mislead anyone. So, why did Saiful deny it? The Burmese doctor also found no evidence of forced or other penetration, no blood-stains, semen or torn clothes/underwear when examining Saiful. (Look at picture above). The DPP did not call the Burmese doctor to testify!!!! 

If there was no penetration, how could any semen have been found deep inside Saiful's body, unless he planted it there himself or with the aid of an accomplice with ulterior motives (See 14 & 15 below)? Which is where a plastic dildo might have come into play!!

11. Saiful also claimed that he had not gone to the toilet or washed himself for 3 days, when questioned about the pristine condition of DNA samples extracted from his body. Does this sound credible to anyone? This is the stuff of babies in the womb choking themselves laughing!

12. Testimony was introduced showing that the day after the alleged incident, Saiful had been seen at Anwar's house, none the worse for wear!

13. Saiful had testified that although he had campaigned for UMNO, he had voted for Anwar and the Opposition!! This dove-tails with another of his claims that Anwar had bought "expensive" designer jeans for him. However, when checked, the jeans in question was found with the labels snipped off, and appeared to be a fake, of the kind sold in Petaling Street. Saiful's claims were convenient, worthless and desperate statements that could not be proved!

14. Despite objections from the Chemistry Department Head, Inspector Jude Pereira had removed DNA samples stored in their freezer and kept it in his desk drawer at Brickfields Police Station. When questioned how he could have been sure about the temperature in those desk drawers at his air-conditioned office to ensure no degradation of the DNA samples, Jude gave his now infamous and scurrilous reply - "I stuck my hands in the drawers and it felt okay"??!!

15. Inspector Jude claimed he only wanted to re-label the samples for clarity, yet after 96 hours outside SOP rules of storage, doctors and chemists swore the DNA samples were pristine, which was a statistical impossibility! Why re-label in secrecy? Why could Inspector Jude not have re-labelled the samples at the Chemistry Department in the presence of its Head and other officers? It's obvious Jude was up to no good, yet the Federal Court dismissed this most crucial evidence that there was a conspiracy to frame Anwar! 

At the High Court, Judge Zainal Abiden, in freeing Anwar, had been convinced that Jude had compromised the chain and nature of the DNA samples. He was the only judge who could have noted Jude's demeanour, body language and the guilty look on his face when pounded by defence lawyers. Yet, the judges at the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court, which included Chief Justice Arifin, refused to concur with Abiden's logical evaluation and judgement. 

16. The High Court judge refused to allow the defence access to Saiful's cautioned statement to the police, other legal documents and the prosecutions list of witnesses!

17. The DNA evidence extracted from Saiful's body suggested the strong possibility that Saiful had sex with other men. This made nonsense of Saiful's claim that he was straight as an arrow. The prosecution glossed over this by claiming the samples could have been contaminated by male doctors. It prompted Anwar's lawyer Ram Karpa singh to remark:

"It seems half a football team's DNA was found on Saiful, but you chose not to report it"! CLICK HERE. The Chemistry Department's DNA specialist, Dr.Seah Lay Hong, refused to respond!

18. In March 2013, Saiful's father, Azlan Mohamad Lazim, held a press conference where he announced that the persecution of Anwar on sodomy charges was an evil political conspiracy planned in Najib's office. Quote: "Even the script I read out to the press after Anwar's acquittal at the High Court was prepared by Najib's officers". CLICK HERE.

Saiful was obviously planted in Anwar's office by Najib and his co-conspirators to try and incriminate Anwar any way they could - innuendos, half-truths and plain lies.

This conspiracy could not in any way have involved ex-PM Badawi. How could it, when it was Badawi and his son-in-law KJ who made sure Anwar's Sodomy1 unjust conviction was squashed in 2004?

Donplaypuks® with political persecutions and conspiracies, Mahathir and serially lying and defrauding PM Najib!



by manu themis, Donplaypuks® intrepid correspondent for true justice affairs


(Click on pic for enlarged view).

The 5-man panel Federal Court justices must be congratulated for their decision yesterday confirming the supremacy of Civil Law in resolving civil marriage disputes and related conversion to Islam cases.

They did this in the case of S.Deepa vs ex-husband N.Viran aka Izwan Abdullah.

Their justices ruled that marriage annulments and ancillary orders following the conversion of one party to Islam cannot be made by the Syariah Court. Divorce and custody in civil marriages should be decided by the Civil Court.

But, the manner in which they went about awarding split custody of the children involved in the case, left a bitter taste in their mother, Deepa's, mouth. In their peculiar wisdom, their justices awarded custody of son Mithran (8) to his father, and daughter Sharmilla (11) to Deepa, after interviewing the children alone in chambers!

Now, really, what do 8 and 11-year old under-aged children know about religion or life, when manipulated by a father with ulterior motives? Especially, a father who broke Syariah laws and illegally converted his children to Islam without their mother's consent, and kidnapped them from their mother's home?

How could senior Federal Court judges who should know better, not realize how traumatized the children must have been? How could they expect such confused innocents to make any sensible choice, frightened as the must have been when confronted by five strange and imposing old men in black robes, no matter how sweet their words?

Let us look at the history of this case:

1. Deepa and Viran, both Hindus, were married under Hindu rites in 2003.
2. Viran filed for divorce in 2011 and converted to Islam in 2013.
3. Viran also had both his children converted to Islam without Deepa's consent, despite which the Syariah administration allowed the conversions to stand.
4. Deepa won back custody of her children in April 2014 at the Seremban High Court. (In May 2015 the court of Appeal affirmed the Seremban High Court decision).
5. Two days after the Seremban High Court decision, Viran kidnapped son Mithran from Deepa's home. Viran justified his criminal conduct by claiming that in 2012, the Syariah Court had granted him custody, even though his converting the children without the mother's consent was illegal.
6. Despite a court order, Police Inspector General Khalid Abu Bakar astonishingly, refused to arrest Viran, claiming that there were two conflicting court orders and that "a father does not kidnap his child". He asked the parties to "settle the matter privately"!!

So, what we have here is a scurrilous man who illegally converted his under-aged children to Islam without their mother's consent, and then, when ordered by a valid and competent Civil Court to comply with its custody order, forcibly kidnapped a child from his family home.

More than that, the Syariah has taken a back-to-the-wall 'it's us or them' myopic attitude. Instead of annulling the illegal conversions, they have continued to flaunt it in the completely innocent mother's face. They may have relied on an earlier case of Islam conversion tussle involving yet another unfortunate Hindu mother, Indira Gandhi, where an idiotic judge ruled that 'parent' in law meant that on their own, either the father or mother in a civil marriage could convert their children to Islam. 

Of course that ignorant judge had not seemed to have been aware of the Constitution and its definitions section which says that any word in the singular includes its plural. In this case, the Syariah approved the children's conversion in their absence, and yet refused to back down when challenged on legal non-compliance!! CLICK HERE AND HERE for details of that travesty of justice.

The Cabinet was supposed to resolve those mistakes in law in black and white, but never got around to it.

So, while yesterday's decision by the Federal Court has gone a long way to settling the law on civil marriages and related Islam conversion cases, Deepa would be right in feeling that justice was not delivered in her particular case and circumstances:

1. The unilateral conversion of the children was illegal and did not comply with Syariah administration rules. Therefore, their justice should have ordered the conversions to be annulled as an administrative error, as affirmed by a judge at the Court of Appeal.

2. Custody of both children should have been awarded to the mother, Deepa. Who could ever trust a man who broke Syariah laws by converting his under-aged Hindu children to Islam unilaterally, broke civil laws ordering surrender of children's custody and terrorized the children by kidnapping them in front of their mother. In Malaysia, a conviction for kidnapping carries whipping and a life or death sentence! What moral and ethical lessons do the judges think the son will be learning from his criminal father? What kind of role model would he be to his son?

3. The judges ordered, on the application of Viran that, because of their split custody order, alimony payable by Viran to Deepa be reduce from $500 per month to $250 per month. Why? Who broke the marriage and who asked for split custody? Can a single mother bring up a child with just $250 a month? Which planet are our judges living in?

4. No action was recommended against Police Inspector General Khalid Abu Bakar for refusing to comply with a court order to apprehend Viran and return custody of the children to Deepa. Is Khalid, who has a law degree, above the law? This looks like a cop out by the highest court in the land. CLICK HERE.

The impression we get is that the judges are afraid of putting the Syariah courts and its administration in its place in case "the natives get restless". But, it is this pussyfooting that is at the root of these conversion issue problems.

I have nothing bad to say about Islam nor do I wish to debate about Syariah laws.

All I demand is that our administrators and judges follow the Constitution with good intent and true justice - substance over form - in mind.

That scurrilous smug and sneering Viran's face-saving parting shot to Deepa - "I pray my former wife will have the revelation to embrace Islam" - tells all. CLICK HERE.

Viran is laughing all the way home, thinking he has got away with several serious criminal acts. Their justices may think that it was a fair compromise. The world probably thinks that tearing a son away from his natural and innocent mother is a crime against humanity akin to forced re-settlement of natives.

Innocent and victimized Malaysian Hindu mother Deepa did NOT go to the Federal Court looking for a compromise. She went there to ask for her Constitutional rights to be confirmed, enforced and protected! Instead, she had her guts yanked out. Their justices may have thought that somehow things got equalized when they split custody of the children. But, what really happened is as as though your house gets robbed, and when caught, the robber gets to keep half the loot. One party got more equalized than the other!

And here I ask the IGP two questions that many Malaysians would really like an answer to, but are afraid to ask openly:

1. Would you have refused to arrest Viran had he not converted to Islam?

2. Would you have refused to arrest Viran had it been a case where he had NOT converted to Islam and had kidnapped the son from a wife who had converted to Islam?

Donplaypuks® with the Constitution and religion, o' justices and IGP!



by chiang pei, Donplaypuks® intrepid correspondent for death wish by firing squad execution affairs

(Click on pic for enlarged view.)


Besieged stooge AG Pandi dug his own grave after white-washing the MACC's investigation into corruption charges against serially lying and defrauding PM Najib. 

The MACC had recommended prosecuting Najib with + or - 37 charges of fraud, misappropriation of public funds, CBT and abuse of power in relation to RM2.6 billion and another RM42 million that had "mysteriously" found its way into Najib's personal bank a/c. 

Najib and his sycophantic BUMNO Ministers and party liars had at first denied any such thing had occurred. "Which fool would do something like that?" they all bleated. Turned out it was their own fool. Then when the whole issue was exposed by the Wall St Journal and Sarawak Report, Najib replied that it was a "donation" and that he had not personally benefited from all that money, despite having used it to buy votes and rig the general election, to be elected PM.

The circus and clowns came out with more and more ridiculous lies. Like the $2.6 billion being a donation from the Saudi Royal family. Or that Najib did not give instructions for transferring or know that RM42 million and RM32 million had been transferred to his a/c??!!

And then, inexplicably, he spent most of that money on dubious payouts, including over RM3 million on diamonds and Birkin bags for his wife from moneys he claimed he had no knowledge of??!!

The world responded with obvious scorn, ridicule and derision. Najib and his fraudsters had succeeded in overnight becoming international celebrity pariahs!

Stooge AG Pandi was stung deep by global criticism of being an accessory to Najib's crimes. To follow the sublime with the ridiculous, stooge AG Pandi's predictable response was in keeping with the denial mode, lying and thieving that has become BUMNO Baru (new) culture. On 6th February 2016, stooge AG Pandi, in an interview with the Sinchew Daily newspaper, shed tears that the government's official secrets were being leaked out with impunity. The government's security apparatus had sprung more holes than Swiss cheese.

Like that would-be thug Beria (security chief, mass murderer, sexual predator and rapist) that stooge AG Pandi is to would-be Stalin, Najib, he said that the current punishment for whistleblowers, a fine and/or jail sentence, were insufficient deterrents. CLICK HERE for Lavrentiy Beria of Russia.

Stooge AG Pandi wanted to table a bill to include 10 strokes of the rotan and life imprisonment for whistleblowers. And here is the icing on the cake CLICK HERE:

"In some countries like China, leaking official secrets carries the death sentence!!"

Stooge AG Pandi of course forgot that whistleblowers are protected by an Act and that the OSA, Sedition Act and SOSMA cannot be used to hide a crime (or murders).

More than that, stooge AG Pandi forgot that if he and Najib were Chinese, by now they would have been, as the Chinese say, "chiang pei" - executed by a firing squad!

Such is the stupidity that reigns supreme in the Malaysian government of thieves and murderers!

Not to be outdone, a certain female MP of dubious sexual orientation in serially lying and defrauding PM Najib's office, supported this idiocy by claiming that official secrets were not leaked in other countries. No one knows which hole she has been hiding and digging in all these years, but obviously she is unaware of Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning. Stupidity breeds stupidity.

Here is what happened to Lavrentiy Beria (who was charged with treason, terrorism and counter-revolutionary activities) in 1953 after Stalin died:

"A tribunal was set up. When the death sentence was passed, Beria begged for mercy on his knees, and then collapsed on the floor, wailing and crying....Beria was taken to the basement of the KGB HQ at Lubyanka, and shot through the head by General Pavel Batitsky who had to stuff a rag in Beria's mouth to stop his bawling. Six of Beria's associates were executed on the same day by a firing squad."

Does stooge AG Pandi have a death wish? Is he asking for a bullet in the head for himself and his meal-ticket-for-life, serially lying and defrauding PM Najib, talking about apeing Chinese practices and standards?

Will our King and Rulers step in before the Military and Generals do?

Donplaypuks® with death wish, bullets in head and execution by firing squads, o' stooge AG Pandi and serially lying and defrauding PM Najib!



By E.S. Shankar, author of 'Murdered In Malaysia:The Altantuya Story'


On 29 January 2016, most Malaysians woke up to the happy news that Bernard Biaocco, a former President of Thales Asia was charged in France with illegally paying commissions to Abdul Razak Baginda. While Malaysia's MSM have been coy about it, several overseas newspapers revealed that judicial documents also named serially lying Prime Minister Najib as a suspected recipient of the illegal bribes. CLICK HERE and HERE.

All of this of course relates to the October 2006 killing of Abdul Razak Baginda's ex-lover Altantuya and the contentious RM7.5 billion Scorpene submarines Malaysian government procurement contract signed in 2002 by then Defence Minister Najib with DCNS, a French government owned company. Abdul Razak Baginda was known to be a close confidante of Najib.

Abdul Razak Baginda's company, Perimekar S/B received RM575 million for "co-ordination and support services" suspected by most to be sham a arrangement to facilitate kick-backs and bribes to various Malaysian government, Ministry of Defence and Naval officers, as well as French figures.

Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted in 2008 in the abetment of Altantuya's murder without his defence being called. He has now admitted that he received RM150 million (Euro30 million) as consultancy fees in the Scorpene submarines deal, but denies "paying any officials". CLICK HERE.

But no one believes Baginda.

The contract for the two Scorpene submarines costing RM7.5 billion was signed in 2002 by then Defence Minister Najib and DCNS which was 75% owned by the French government, and 25% owned by Thales. 

Abdul Razak Baginda received the commissions through Perimekar S/B which was re-structured immediately after the Scorpene submarines contract was signed. This resulted in Perimekar being 60% owned by Abdul Razak Baginda, with the remaining 40% owned by the Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT or Armed Forces Fund). 20% was held directly by LTAT with another 20% being held by LTAT's 70% subsidiary, Boustead Plc. Who is LTAT CEO and Boustead Plc Chairman - none other than Lodin Wok Kamarudin, who is also Chairman of 1MDB, controlled by Finance Minister and Prime Minister, Najib!!

Abdul Razak Baginda's 60% in Perimekar was held through his family company KS Ombak Laut S/B in which his wife, Mazlinda, was also a director. Baginda sold the 40% stake in Perimekar to the LTAT Group for RM 7 million. This is a surprisingly low figure and valuation, given that Perimekar was due to receive RM575 million in fees!!

Another Baginda family company, Terasasi (Hong Kong) Ltd. in which his father was also a director, received RM180 million, which led to Baginda being accused of being a traitor. It was alleged that that payment was for Baginda selling state and naval official secrets to DCNS!!

Where did all this money coming from. Well, here's what was said in our Parliament in 2007:

The murder of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu cropped up in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday. While debating the 2007 Budget (committee stage) for the Defence Ministry, Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Ipoh Timur) prodded deputy minister Datuk Zainal Abidin Zin on the use of C4 explosives. "The case of the Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu, which involved Abdul Razak Baginda, portrayed a very bad image of Malaysia. You are the deputy defence minister, how did the perpetrators obtain the explosives?" he asked. Zainal Abidin replied: "The police are investigating the case, not me. I don’t know the answer to that question." "But how is it that someone can obtain C4 explosives so easily?" repeated Lim. "I have already told you, it is not the defence ministry that is conducting investigations," said Zainal Abidin. Lim had earlier asked about the US$100 million (RM354.9 million) commission for the purchase of two submarines in 2002. He said the purchase from a French-Spanish supplier had been handled by a company controlled by Abdul Razak, which had in turn sold it to the government. "The commission was part of the final bill to the government, correct?" he asked. Zainal responded: "The commission was given by the foreign supplier to the company. We do not have a say in the matter, we were a willing buyer." "But if the commission was part of the price, it is additional taxpayers’ money that is being used," said Lim. "We were a willing partner in the transaction," replied Zainal Abidin."

The Malaysian government therefore agreed to participate in fraud, bribery, misuse of public funds, abuse of power and crime!

In simple English, the RM575 million commission was paid for by the Malaysian Taxpayer!

Then Defence Minister and now PM, Najib, was involved up to his eyeballs in creating a sham contract. DCNS Group of France paid the illegal commission, but it was costed into the RM7.5 billion as sham consultancy and co-ordination and support fees!

And Abdul Razak Baginda claims he was not involved or did not know anything about it all? 

Who would pay Abdul Razak Baginda a genuine consultancy fee when he had no expertise whatsoever or knowledge of stealth Scorpene submarines and their maintenance?

More so, when in July 2013, Malaysian Jasbir Singh Chaal revealed that it was he, an ex-accountant with Thales Asia, who was the architect of the Scorpene submarines deal. And that Abdul Razak Baginda was a marginal figure. CLICK HERE.

So, Abdul Razak Baginda is not being entirely truthful about his REAL role in the Scorpene contract.

But, it will come out soon in France. Then, where will Abdul Razak Baginda and serially lying PM Najib hide?

Also, following the example set by stooge AG Pandi, this is not all very Islamic, is it? What exactly does Abdul Razak Baginda's Islamic Peace Foundation do? Has it been funded with tainted money? 

Murder, fraud, misappropriation of government funds, bribery, CBT, abuse of power - these are just some of the charges Abdul Razak Baginda and serially lying and defrauding PM Najib will soon have to answer for, in a Malaysian court!!



by bobo the clown, Donplaypuks® intrepid correspondent for right royal circus affairs



One issue is clear: serially lying PM Najib's Public Relations (PR/spindoctoring) Department occupying the 5th floor at Putridjaya, is his own worst enemy. 

Najib who has an unrecalibrated unlimited Bajet (Budget), is wasting hundreds of millions of the Rakyat's money to lie to try and prop up his internationally tattered and tattered reputation and image. The 2016 Bajet for the Prime Minister's Office (PMO), generally regarded as a slush (illegal) fund to bank-roll BUMNO/ SCUMNO election campaigns, is a staggering RM20 billion!!?? Not even Obama has that kind of financial clout!

The latest attempts are the 3 videos posted by fugitive and convicted Altantuya C4 killer, Sirul Hj Umar. CLICK HERE for my earlier detailed blog post of 31/01/2016 on that matter.

In the 3rd video, where for superstitious/black magic/guilt reasons Sirul dares not mention Altantuya by name, he reveals that Najib was not involved or had any connections with Altantuya's brutal and inhumane execution in October 2006.

But just last September, Sirul was featured in an Al Jazeera TV Program 'Murder in Malaysia' where among other matters:

1. He revealed that Abdul Razak Baginda, Najib's blue-eyed boy linked to corruption over the RM7.5 billion Scorpene submarines government procurement contract and RM575 million suspected sham "facilitation and support fee" commission, had pulled the trigger in the shooting and killing of Altantuya! CLICK HERE for the YouTube video on that confession.

2. He also revealed to Al Jazeera reporter Mary Ann Jolly that he had been negotiating allegedly with Abdul Salam bin Ahmed, purportedly Najib's agent, for Australian $17 million to keep silent about his (Najib's) involvement in Altantuya's murder. 

Salam recently filed a defamation law suits against Al Jazeera. He claimed he had neither offered any money to Sirul nor was he an agent of Najib. But, he did not clearly explain the text messages or why he visited Sirul a number of times at the Villawood Immigration Detention centre in Sydney, Australia.

Mary Ann Jolly had retrieved the text messages relating to these negotiations from Sirul's handphone and these have now been published world-wide. CLICK HERE for Sarawak Report's detailed article on the Al Jazeera TV program.

Predictably, Najib and the Malaysian government dismissed the Al Jazeera expose. The IGP, like the predictably lapdog that he is to Najib, refused to re-open the Altantuya murder despite Al Jazeera's brilliant investigative work.

Now, Sirul has come out and done a U-turn by saying:

"I swear here in Allah's name that His Honourable Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dato Seri Najib Abdul Razak was never involved in that case or had any connections with it."

The timing of Sirul's U-turn, coming as it does so soon after stooge AG Pandi refused to act on + or - 37 charges of corruption, CBT and money-laundering recommended by the MAC against serially lying PM Najib, cannot be a mere coincidence. 

Do note that Sirul swore on Allah's name, but exactly like Najib in August 2008 in denying he ever met Altantuya, he did not swear on the Quran!! Accordingly, as far as the Malays and Muslim diaspora are concerned, both swearings mean nothing! Any liar can swear in the name of God anywhere, but it's only fit to be thrown in the rubbish bin.

So, yet another move by serially lying PM Najib to lie his way out of complicity in Altantuya's 2006 murder has failed to spark off, like a damp squib (fireworks). Millions of ringgit of Malaysian Taxpayers' money has gone down the drain even as they face a possible recession brought on by plummeting oil price. Millions face greater and greater difficulty in managing the soaring cost of living enhanced by 6% GST and the mismanagement of the economy by Najib. Billions of ringgit have disappeared without any transparency or accountability, primarily caused by Najib's clueless administration of 1MDB and GLCs and his own corrupt criminality!

Any wonder that Najib is Malaysia's most reviled, cursed and inept prime minister and finance minister who is now the subject of international ridicule, derision, contempt and scorn; a true international pariah? 

Stop clowning around, serially lying PM Najib. Your days are numbered. A warm cell awaits you in Bamboo Resort Resort! Enjoy!

Donplaypuks® with C4 murders and cover-ups, O' serially lying PM Najib and fugitive murderers!