BADAWI NAIVE ABOUT ALTANTUYA'S C4 MURDER, NAJIB SHOULD ANSWER. RCI ONLY WAY. AAB BUTT OUT!

by I swear with fingers crossed, donplaypuks® intrepid correspondent for  C4 murder affairs

Ex-PM Abdullah Ahmad Bawadi's (AAB) unsolicited opinion last week that PM Najib has nothing to do with Altantuya's murder on 19 October 2006, deserves serious examination, analysis and rebuttal. 

But before that, we must recognise that paid and unpaid BUMNO/SCUMNO/Barang Naik bloggers waged a hate campaign against AAB while he was still PM in 2008, citing the loss of the 2/3 majority as a primary reason. (As Najib barely won the 2013 General Elections with a much reduced majority compared to Badawi, in fact losing the popular vote by 47:53, why did these same bloggers not ask for his head on a platter?). They openly supported Maha Firaun in toppling him, and gloated in their blogs, when AAB eventually resigned.

In fact, the smear crusade against AAB went from the sublime to the ridiculous, when the paid and unpaid BUMNO/SCUMNO bloggers attempted to re-write history to blame AAB for ALL the ills and woes that arose from 22 years of Maha Firaun's evil regime.  Maha actively encouraged economic and criminal looting and plundering and grand auto-theft and larceny on an unprecedented scale with deliberately under-prepared prosecutions of cronies, or at worst, a slap on the wrist. Affirmative action policies meant to benefit the genuinely disadvantaged were diverted for their own benefit by cronies and BUMNO/SCUMNO/Barang Naik  "warlords". Thievery had become the culture of BUMNO/ SCUMNO/Barang Naik to the extent that you could not distinguish the crooks from the PM, Ministers and Deputy Ministers. 

One of them still continues to blame AAB and 'the Brader" for every economic and financial mishap and awry policies, such as education and religious curricula, going back to 1980. Yet, it was Maha Firaun and his side-kick Diam Diam who ruled with an iron fist and were responsible for all those mega financial scandals, brooking no opposition from within or without. Who was responsible for the 1998 Asian Financial Crisis that bankrupted many Bumiputra businesses and spawned many bailouts mostly using Petronas's money - Maha Firaun with his grandiose white elephant spending, poor planning, PR and international jew-baiting or "the Brader" and AAB? Who compensated a crony RM700 million for a crooked bridge whose proper design had not even seen pen put to paper when it was rightfully cancelled by AAB - Maha Firaun or "the Brader" or AAB?

Why was AAB made to appear the villain of the piece? Was he perceived as being more corrupt and crony-controlled than Maha Firaun? Did he, like Maha Firaun, cover-up RM30 billion of forex losses generated by the central bank, and lie to Parliament and the citizens about it? And then to rub salt into the wound, bring back as Minister the very shaitan (devil) who was sacked for the galactic forex trading losses, and allow him to prosper financially?

First, AAB rectified the injustice done to "the Brader" vis-a-vis the Sodomy1 trials by setting him free from prison. That was a very resounding slap that reverberated internationally from the thick skin of Maha Firaun's face. 

AAB was also targeted because he, instead of paying lip-service and packing Royal Commission of Inquiries (RCI) with testicularly challenged 'yes men' actually instituted RCI's which made welcome recommendations. The 'Judge For Yourself' RCI instructed the AG to proceed with charges against 2 ex-Chief Justices (AND Maha Firaun for his role) for fixing senior judicial appointments, and corruption. The RCI's 'yes' to the setting up of the IPCMC was another milestone for a more open government under AAB. As of today, the premiership under Grossmeldajib who wears the pants and her husband who wears the skirts and panties, has not lifted a finger to implement the recommendations of these two RCI's. Instead they have resurrected the colonial-era (once communist targeted) Sedition Act after announcing to the whole world that it would be abolished, and bolstered it with an even more repressive Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) to which all right-minded citizens must say 'PODA' (piss off, in Tamil).

But perhaps, the biggest public slap in Maha Firaun's face was when AAB apologised on behalf of the people for the sacking in 1988 of Chief Justice Salleh Abas. The termination was manipulated and engineered completely by Maha Firaun, who some years later again lied and misled the citizens by attempting to shift the entire blame for the fiasco, outrageously to a Sultan. AAB approved RM10 million compensation be paid to Salleh Abas, as well as RM5 million to two other judges who stood their ground against Maha Firaun's evil deed in compromising the judiciary and setting judges against judges and lawyers against lawyers.

After what seemed an eternity, we had a prime minister who had the cojones to restore a clear separation of powers between the Legislature, Executive and the Judiciary.

But this did not sit well with Maha Firaun or BUMNO/SCUMNO 'Ketuanan' extremists. If Maha Firaun were ever forced to spill the beans, it would be curtains for  them all! No more gaji buta (sinecure) billion ringgit contracts, or Plc chairmanships and directorships. No more 'lawatan sambil belajar' (study-cum-travel) visits to Bangkok, (the belly-dancing halls) of Cairo, and Lebanon, to Disneyland and London, Paris, Tokyo, Munich, Sydney and New York, all expenses paid, spouses, second, third & fourth wives, mistresses and maids included. They started the vilification by viciously labeling AAB 'The Sleeping PM" even though they were all well aware that he tended to nod off in Parliament and public function as he suffered from "Sleep Apnea' disorder, and not from late-night partying. They 'anonymously' published photographs of AAB snoozing. The rest is history. But let's not be deceived either into thinking that AAB was an angel.
 

AAB was quoted a few days ago as saying: 

"Based on the findings from the thorough investigation conducted by the Royal Malaysian Police that was conveyed to me, it was confirmed that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is not involved at all in the case."

So thorough that 2 police officers were charged with perjury, Azilah was not read his rights when interrogated and Sirul's signed and sworn full and chilling confession was ruled inadmissible at the High Cour trial. They could not produce an iota of evidence to prove that Altantuya was shot, yet went through the whole rigmarole of linking a bullet casing "found" in Sirul's car with a Heckler & Koch silencer-fittted machine gun assigned to him, even though a UTK weapons store-keeper testified on the stand that all bullets issued to Sirul had been returned intact!! So thorough that the police could not identify the owner/driver of a blue proton car that had passed by Abdul Razak Baginda's house on the night of the murder, yet RPK could, so easily. So, thorough, that till today we do not know if immigration records were erased, although a witness testified to that effect in open court! So thorough, that judges and prosecutors were switched at the last moment without proper notice or explanations. And there's more (later)......

So, AAB's 'opinion' was based on the investigation carried out by ex-IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan. But Musa has now come out publicly to say that he had in fact filed a report in 2006 identifying the motive for Altantuya's murder, thereby socking one to the goolies of the current IGP who warned citizens not to speculate about the motive for Altantuya's murder. He cited that "action could be taken for undermining the judiciary". Musa more or less also kicked the ball into Abdul Razak Baginda's court when he said:

"But what motive is there to establish for Azilah and Sirul to kill Altantuya, when the main suspect has been cleared?"  

So, how did AAB conclude that Najib had nothing to do with Altantuya's murder by C4 explosives when 5 persons associated with him were implicated in her murder?:

1. Abdul Razak Baginda (St. John's alumni and primary beneficiary through Perimekar S/B, of RM575 million "support and co-ordination" fee related to the M7.5 billion navy contract signed by Najib for 2 Scorpene submarines).
2. DSP Musa Safir (Najib's security chief).
3. Aide and adviser, Nasir Safar (driver of blue proton car).
4. Azilah Hadri (and Rohaniza Roslan, his girlfriend of 9-years standing), head of PM and Deputy PM's security detail).
5. Sirul Azhar Umar (member of PM/Deputy PM's security detail).

What about that Military Intelligence Report and RPK's Statutory Declaration made on 18 June 2008 in which he swore he was reliably informed that a very well-know prime minister's wife was spotted at the murder scene at the time of the murder? (CLICK HERE).

Najib may have sworn on the Koran. That may allay the suspicions of some Muslims, but not all. We all now know that the Hudud Bill approved by the Kelantan State government appears to be in conflict with the actual words and provisions in the Koran. So, did Najib comply with the actual requirements of the Koran, or a modified version of it? He said 'the Mongolian woman" not Altantuya, didn't he? Why? Why did he not specifically identify her by name? In any event, the rest of the civilized world is fully entitled to hold him accountable to the laws of the land and a standard that is enshrined in the Constitution. Otherwise, there is a loophole here which any Muslim can easily exploit to avoid facing the full force of the civil and criminal laws of our country.

More than anything else, the yes, no, yes, verdicts by three courts is a clear indication that either a re-investigation and re-trial is necessary, OR, given that fingers are being pointed at the occupant of the highest public office in the land, a Royal Commission of Inquiry is in order. Who sits on the panel of this RCI must not be influenced or dictated to by Maha Firaun, Najib and his Cabinet or BUMNO/SCUMNO/Barang Naik. Neither must any ex-IGP or ex-CJ be appointed to the panel. 

I think  Justice Hishamuddin Mohd Yunus, or ex-High Court judge Syed Ahmad Idid Syed Abdullah Aidid who was hounded out of office by the AG for telling the truth about judges on the take, would be ideal. We want judges of impeccable stature and integrity to ferret out the truth and recommend the punishment for thieves and murderers;  bloodhounds as opposed to mere watchdogs, and not 'yes men' and BUMNO/SCUMNO/Barang Naik lap dogs and poodles like a certain accountable committee which always renders the verdict that "all government procedures were adhered to, so, there was no wrong-doing". Bah, what a bunch of  cover-up artistes and a total waste of public money!

I am afraid AAB has to be more forthcoming and provide more details or BUTT OUT!!

 

Donplaypuks® with murders, investigations and alibis, man!

Based on the findings from the thorough investigation conducted by the Royal Malaysian Police that was conveyed to me, it was confirmed that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is not involved at all in the case - See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/pak-lah-says-najib-innocent-of-altantuya-murder#sthash.eVDG25sq.dpuf

Based on the findings from the thorough investigation conducted by the Royal Malaysian Police that was conveyed to me, it was confirmed that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is not involved at all in the case - See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/pak-lah-says-najib-innocent-of-altantuya-murder#sthash.eVDG25sq.dpuf